indexing - ElasticSearch/Lucene not_analyzed: difference from relational databases -


i'm new elasticsearch indexing aspects unclear. wonder if more efficient relational database in following case.

there document schema containing many simple string , numeric fields. fields set known, can represented relational table well. string values identifiers analyzer turned off. search made full-value match strings , numeric comparison (equal, less, greater) numbers. assume fields count large, lets 200.

search criteria may include combination of fields.

i don't know how es performs search of not_analyzed fields guess there no big difference relational databases.

the relative performance (relational vs. es) going depend on size of data , complexity of queries.

elasticsearch designed query performance - generally should find es faster , more scalable relational.

however you'll need run tests data queries confirm though.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

java - Plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-install-plugin:2.4 or one of its dependencies could not be resolved -

Round ImageView Android -

How can I utilize Yahoo Weather API in android -